The Calculus of Explanations

Putting the fun in functionals


The largest area: Part II

Here we will consider the 3D analogue of the problem mentioned in the previous post, and first define the two paraboloids (the 3D analogue of parabolas):

\begin{aligned} z_1\left(x,y\right) &= x^2 + y^2 + 1, \quad z_2\left(x,y\right) &= x^2 + y^2 \end{aligned}

This time we’ll call the tangent point T = \left(x_T,y_T\right). Then the slope of the tangent plane of z_1\left(x,y\right) at T in each direction is given by the partial derivatives of z_1:

\displaystyle \frac{\partial z_1}{\partial x}\left(x_T,y_T\right) = 2x_T, \qquad \displaystyle \frac{\partial z_1}{\partial y}\left(x_T,y_T\right) = 2y_T

And so the equation for the tangent plane P is constructed by taking z_1(x_T,y_T) and adding linear functions with these slopes for the two coordinates x and y:

P\left(x,y;T\right) = 2x_T\left(x - x_T\right) + 2y_T\left(y - y_T\right) + x_T^2 + y_T^2 + 1

Play around with the sliders here to see the tangent plane and the associated volume underneath change shape (Note that I had to strategically cut the outer paraboloid so we can see what’s going on).

If you solve for the region of intersection between P\left(x,y;T\right) and z_2\left(x,y\right), and find that they intersect at the circle of radius 1 centred at T. Let’s call this circle R.

From here, we can define the volume V bounded below P\left(x,y;T\right) and above z_2\left(x,y\right) as the double integral:

V =  \displaystyle \iint_R P\left(x,y;T\right) - z_2\left(x,y\right) \mathrm{d}R =  \displaystyle \iint_R 1 - \left(x - x_T\right)^2 - \left(y - y_T\right)^2 \mathrm{d}R

We now introduce a change of variables u = x + x_T and v = y + y_T. This transformation is linear and the Jacobian is 1, so our region of intersection simply becomes a circle of radius 1 centered at the origin. Thus V becomes

V = \displaystyle \iint_{R'} \displaystyle \left(1 - u^2 - v^2\right) \mathrm{d}R'

We first note that V is (once again, if you read the first post in this series) indifferent to the tangent point T! To compute this integral, we now transform our coordinates from Cartesian to Polar coordinates:

u = r \cos\left(\theta\right), \quad v = r \sin\left(\theta\right) \longrightarrow \mathrm{d}R' = r \, \mathrm{d}r \, \mathrm{d}\theta,

a common trick from multivariable calculus. Then we have

\begin{aligned} V &= \iint_{R'} \displaystyle \left(1 - u^2 - v^2\right) \mathrm{d}R' \\ &= \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \int_0^1 \left(1 - r^2\right) r \, \mathrm{d}r \, \mathrm{d}\theta \\ &= \displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} 1 \, \mathrm{d}\theta \int_0^1 \left(1 - r^2\right) r \, \mathrm{d}r \\ &= \left[\theta\right]_{-\pi}^{\pi} \left[\frac{r^2}{2} - \frac{r^4}{4}\right]_0^1 \\ &= 2\pi \cdot \frac{1}{4} \\ V& = \frac{\pi}{2} \end{aligned}

So just like the base case with the parabolas, in this case the volume is a constant. Is this true in all higher dimensions, for all possible n-dimensional paraboloids? This will be discussed in the next post, but [spoiler], yes. The integrals always turn out to be independent of where you place the tangent point.

This in itself is pretty cool, but something that really stood out to us was the pattern of values themselves. If we call the area, volume or hyper-volume under the tangent in n dimensions S_n, and we call the base case n=1 because parabolas are 1D curves, then we have

S_1 = \displaystyle \frac{4}{3}, \quad S_2 = \displaystyle \frac{\pi}{2} , \quad S_3 = \text{?}

Can you guess the next value in the series?

Even though we only have two terms, they strongly reminded me of something I read about as an undergrad, and David was able to provide the calculations to prove the conjecture!

See the third and final post in this series to see the conclusion to the story, it’ll be a ball, I promise.

Stay curious!



2 responses to “The largest area: Part II”

  1. […] What we found was extremely surprising, I hope you’ll join us to explore this problem further in the next post. […]

    Like

  2. […] Part II of this series, we wondered whether the result of the area being constant continued into higher […]

    Like

Leave a reply to A problem of hyper-paraboloids – The Calculus of Explanations Cancel reply

Hi there! I’m a content creator with a background in maths education and a passion for making complicated ideas simple, with intuitive animations and visual explanations.

Whether you’re just entering high school or you’re a post-grad student, or just have an interest in maths in general, I aim to make content that can appeal to everyone, in the form of videos and blog posts.

You can find all my previous posts here.

Check out my YouTube channel for more maths education content.